After reading about history in the
classroom and the impact of students’ ideas on history, I found I had many conflicting
ideas in my mind about how we teach our students history. Even after reading these articles it does not
give us a clear answer about what is right and what is wrong about teaching
kids history.
One thing that stuck out to me was
how interconnected the ideas of citizenship of students are to how we teach
history. It appears to me that how much
of the country currently teaches history further conditions students in the
path of personally responsible citizens, whereas it could stretch them to be
social justice citizens. As Greenwalt
says, “The goal of teaching American history has long been the creation of citizens who are
loyal to this narrative and are willing to take action to support it.” This makes me think as teachers we are
continuing to permeate the idea of the personally responsible citizen. This does not give students a chance to think
or question on their own.
Again, this brings up
the ideas and concerns about how to teach and confront young students with more
“radical” ideas. How do we teach young
students to be social justice citizens?
How do we teach students history outside of a neatly packaged box? As addressed in History-It Can be Elementary,
not much history is explicitly taught in younger grades but often we still have
the experience of discussing historical events with young students. For example, when discussing President’s Day
or Martin Luther King Jr. Day we are confronted with the task of explaining why
these men are important to U.S. History.
This very often leads to me glossing over the facts to present a simple
and soft version of their history.
One reason, even when
I taught fifth grade, that I often felt unequipped to discuss and extend
students in history was my own lack of knowledge in addition to the common
constraint of time. Having minored in
math and ESL in undergraduate, my history knowledge is reduced to anything I
can remember from my own schooling, which was sensationalized as many other
students experienced. As much as I was
educated about many things in undergraduate education, a deep dive in the
issues and topics I may be teaching was not one of them and I find myself in
the same boat as many other elementary education teachers. Anderson reminds
readers, “Students
training to be teachers, especially those being educated to teach in elementary
schools, know little about the history of slavery, he stated, noting that “much
curriculum and teaching around racially and ethnically diverse [people]
features a fun—foods and festival—approach to learning.”” How can we change our
approach to teaching teachers to teach social issues? This will continue to be a source of problem
as we continue to write a difficult historical narrative.
As we
watch and reflect on the news today, history and difficult topics are not going
away. Students in the future will
continue to be asked to learn about and understand issues that are not always
pretty and can be simplified into a cute picture with fun type font. As I said after reading, I still do not have
a clear black and white answer about what and how to teach my students as I
would a math or science concept but I do feel a renewed sense of responsibility
to ensure facts like these, “among 12th-graders, only 8 percent could
identify slavery as the cause of the Civil War.” from Anderson do not continue
to be a reality for our students.